Collaboration is Not an Adjective

Lynn Wolf-Hill • October 26, 2023

Have you heard that agile is dead? Or maybe do you even believe it? Read on....

If you have been paying a modicum of attention to the world around you as of late, with its increasing chaos, AND you have drilled your attention down to your employment role as a caring, passionate kind of individual—you have seen a real saturation and overuse of the word “agile” in business. You can throw the word “transformation” in the mix, too. The promise of agility is transparency, courage, and speed, but at the core is what’s at the very top of the agile manifesto: “We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it.”


Let’s focus on the verbs: ”…uncovering better ways…and helping others do it.”  These are the action words of people getting things done because they are being agile. It’s that work that led them to agree on similar values. What I am seeing in the business world, is people trying to slice up agile and turn it into siloes and hierarchies, where what is really needed is for people to be agile and help each other. In my opinion, many people are missing the point.


I have heard leaders complain that the agile camp is mainly talk and doesn’t deliver. But if anyone went to a restaurant, would they want someone to quickly plop food on the table in front of them? Of course, being a foodie, I am going to choose this analogy.  Would it be ok that the food was tasteless or undercooked, as long as it came out fast? Would it matter if the waitstaff delivering that food was rude or intrusive?

At the same time, sometimes the agilist might be likened to the waitstaff person who keeps asking you if the food is good when you’ve barely had time to chew it, or the floor manager who engages with the customers a lot, but leaves them wandering when their entrée will be arriving.

Accountable agilists must reinforce their own bias for action and have ways to share the promise of agility with transparency and outcomes. Data collection is more than just numbers, and measuring can be as simple as a “yes” or “no,” to start. As of late, there are a lot of agile titles that have a whiff of waterfall, a hierarchy of coach, team coach, enterprise coach, transformation director, and many layers in-between. Some individuals want the salary and hierarchy titles with no interest in helping others or possessing the experience with bringing out the creativity and rigor necessary for a more than “average” delivery. If the agile titles are meant as descriptions of a role they make sense, but all agility growth is derived values, principles, and experiences resulting in delivering impact. Back to food—the reason why people pay over a hundred dollars a plate in a restaurant, is because they liked the ambience, quality, and taste of the food, and while they might be able to do it themselves—not as seamlessly. In these restaurants the staff have specialties, but they work together seamlessly as a collaborative team. Customers will gladly pay someone for a great customer experience, whether your product or service is a restaurant or a software platform

Leaders who have a breadth of experience and deep expertise in growing future leaders and contributing innovators may need a bird’s eye view of whether the talent within their organizations work in siloes. HR may have expertise in people, but they need to collaborate with IT and “blur the lines” rather than staking out boundaries and refusing to listen to each other. It’s often how people communicate. Agile is meant to be like the icing between all the layers of a cake(see what I did there? Food for thought.). If you’re hearing from the strategy group that the agile coaches need to stick to training teams  only, and just about frameworks, and quit talking about change management because that’s ours—siloes exists. If you’re hearing the Instructional Design folks say training can’t be delivered unless it is done with a certain methodology and process—that’s a bottleneck. If IT gets training but not the product teams—that is another silo.

Agilists usually have a preferred, yet not a singular source for continuous learning. My first go-to is ICAgile, because I know they have taken some of the prep work out for me.(Oh and that they are an excellent organization helps.) I don’t have to know the basic tenets of instructional design to learn, because they have done that. The coursework embodies it without talking at me. Education is not one voice in the room with expertise, but several thought leaders. Courseware is created by market demand and by multiple people with expertise. I am suggesting the same approach of being responsive over teaching on how to do so within your organization. If  you are a leader who wants more than what’s expected, and more on the unexpected—it’s time to set one expectation: collaboration.

           

Within agile teams, there are people who have expertise in specific areas. In theory if not in actuality, everyone understands what the other members of the team are doing. If the team has implemented continuous learning as part of their delivery iterations, then organizations won’t lose as much time and money onboarding and training new people. Employees may gain some confidence and satisfaction adding to their repertoire. How does your organization reward? Is it for expertise individually and delivery as a team? Incentivizing in a way that enables collaboration has long-term benefits.

           

Soooo back to FOOD. The floor manager needs to know what the cook is making. The waitstaff needs to bring it out while it is fresh, or hot, and the quality of the food is at its best. And while this is an over-simplification of the restaurant industry, the collaboration allows for a customer experience that brings people in for return business. Collaboration isn’t a concept or to be treated as an adjective, when implemented and incentivized, your roadmap is paved for future leaders and true innovation on the horizon. (Don’t forget to pack delicious snacks on the journey.)

Let’s start evolving the promise of agile rather than focusing on the titles, let’s break down the siloes, and let’s collaborate more with each other and deliver amazing impact while helping others do it - with transparency, courage, and speed.


Resources

By Lynn Wolf-Hill July 24, 2025
 A couple of years ago a friend shared an article on how a man made art using artificial intelligence and had an online store. I think his real money came from charging people to learn how to do it. She said,” You could do that!” I wasn’t really sold on the idea but did check out the app she sent my way. It was fun to play with it. I could tweak the prompts and refine how it showed up, long before I knew what a “prompt” was. It had a free trial, and then a monthly price, but as it was in beta, if I gave it a lump sum I could have it for life. And so I did… I used to create images with it every day, but I can’t remember the last time I used it. I can now do the same thing in ChatGPT if I really work hard on the prompts, super specific. I initially paid for the pro version, and now I am using the “plus” option. This allows you to use it as much as you like, and you have access to early releases of functionality. I can think of similar evolution of online tools. There was a race between My Space and Facebook. Before some of the widely used browsers like Google and Safari, there were SO MANY browsers. I like Infoseek and Peoplefinder. Their titles alluded to their differentiation from the competition. And now…? Workplaces got all policy-happy with use of internet at work, and now it’s free out-of-the-box software included with your laptop. So why pay for AI? I very often see these AI-generated advertisements letting me know that old people only use AI like they would Google, and then the ad will go on to list all the AI tools and apps you need to train yourself daily. “Wait, am I being bullied into doing homework? Initially, just as companies have self-contained large learning models, I believed if I paid for my AI, my “projects “or “agents,” were protected. I was writing The A3 Framework: Staying Ahead of the Curve by Combining Agile, AI, and Audit. Related to that activity, I was researching a great deal around international protections in place. (They changed more than once in a short timeframe. I was concerned that things I wrote and submitted could be searched for and found by anybody, making my book obsolete before it was ever published. I really really wish I had searched on the public version for contrast. I did compare different AI tools to contrast what came back. Some were better than others. And now, many organizations are asking employees to use internal AI tools to “teach” the LLM. Several people I have been coaching have provided some feedback on this. Their insight includes frustration with teaching the internal tool when they already had trained their own LLM, and the AI gave them worthless return on their prompts. There’s concern that their ideas can be “stolen,” or what they looked for can be somehow weaponized by HR. So what is your favorite AI platform? I miss my “Ask Jeeves” browser… are we going to continue paying for AI, and are we sure the very things we think need protecting ARE? A couple of years ago, a friend sent me an article about a guy who used artificial intelligence to make art and sell it online. She said, “You could do that!” I wasn’t totally sold on the idea, but I tried out the app she recommended. It was fun—tweaking the inputs and refining what showed up, even before I knew what a “prompt” was. The app had a free trial and a monthly fee, but since it was still in beta, I could pay a lump sum for lifetime access. So I did. I used to generate images every day. Now? I can’t remember the last time I opened it. These things evolve fast. I can now create similar images in ChatGPT—if I get really specific with the prompts. I’ve gone from using the “pro” version to “plus,” which gives me unlimited access and early releases of new tools. It feels like I’m always upgrading, always shifting, but never really arriving. I’ve seen this before. Remember My Space vs. Facebook? Or before Google and Safari took over—there were tons of browsers: I liked Infoseek and PeopleFinder. Their names hinted at their unique flavor. And now? Browsers are just baked into your laptop, part of the default software package. No big deal. So, why pay for AI? Lately I keep seeing ads that say only “old people” use AI like Google. Then the ad flips and starts listing the 12 AI tools I’m apparently supposed to train myself on daily. Wait—am I being bullied into doing homework? When I first started using AI tools to help write The A3 Framework: Staying Ahead of the Curve by Combining Agile, AI, and Audit, I assumed that paying for them meant my data was protected. I believed that my “projects” or “agents” were somehow mine. I was researching a lot of international privacy protocols at the time (which changed more than once during the writing process), and I was genuinely worried that drafts I submitted could be scraped and show up in someone else’s search results before my book was even published. I really wish I had searched on the public version too—just for contrast. I did compare responses across different AI tools. Some were better than others. But I didn’t expect the rapid pace of change to outpace the very protections I was researching. And now, many companies are encouraging employees to “teach” internal AI tools—to help train their organization’s LLMs. Several of the people I’ve coached have shared frustrations with this. Some of them had already spent time training their own personal LLMs to get decent results. Now they’re being asked to start over—often for worse outcomes. There’s also this quiet anxiety around ideas being harvested, someone tracing their searches, will this be used by HR in ways I didn’t agree to? The discomfort is real. We pay for AI tools hoping for privacy, productivity, maybe even a competitive edge—but are we getting that? Or are we just onboarding ourselves into systems we don’t fully understand? So what IS your favorite AI platform? I miss my Ask Jeeves browser. Maybe we’re not just paying for AI—we’re paying for a false sense of control.
October 18, 2024
Why Your VSPMs Aren't Delivering - And How Generative AI Can Fix It!
More Posts