“We’ve Adopted Agile and Trained Up Our People; Why Would We Hire an External Enterprise Coach as Follow-Up?”

Lynn Wolf-Hill • September 10, 2024

The Value of Outside Coaches in Transforming Organizations

Executive Summary
Many organizations increasingly adopt agile practices, often solely for the purpose of expediting the delivery of a prod
uct, service, or business value. Decision-makers believe that the journey ends once agile frameworks are in place, and employees have been trained or have certifications.  However, despite the adoption, companies can often struggle to reach their full potential without external guidance. Professional coaching enhances organizational performance, surfaces and addresses latent challenges, and helps move from maintaining to excelling.
 

Introduction: Agile Expansion
Agile and supporting frameworks, such as Scrum, Kanban, etc., have transformed the way organizations operate. In the last twenty-five years, you can almost trace its auspicious beginnings from the snowbird’s agile manifesto, moving from the West Coast software development industries to business agility, and now, so much related to government need. Agile practices have spread across industries as a means of increasing adaptability, customer focus, and continuous improvement. However, simply adopting agile methodologies does not guarantee optimal outcomes. Many organizations plateau or face new challenges as they scale their agile practices, particularly within complex systems.


Key Question: Why would an agile organization still need an external enterprise coach?
Enterprise coaches can provide significant value even to organizations that are already agile; continuous coaching provides more than “just” maintaining sustainable agility. Culture and change aren’t always asynchronous, there needs to be a good facilitator with an unjaundiced eye to get to that next plateau.

 

1. Continuous Improvement and Growth
One core tenet of agile emphasizes continuous improvement, where iterative enhancements are made to processes, teams, and outcomes. Over time, many organizations often struggle to sustain an agile mindset, instead focusing only on faster output. While there may be a customer-centric focus, it is often at the expense of internal collaborations and internal relationships. There are rewards for delivery and output, but often not for creating product leaders, and future leadership development. As for the 4 values and twelve principles—how often does that get revisited? If an organization uses the Objectives and Key Results approach, if the why wasn’t captured, this will end up being a framework built on sand rather than a solid foundation.
 
An enterprise coach helps people at ALL levels look for opportunities for better performance and to avoid falling into complacency. They foster a growth mindset, helping individuals and identifying systems’ weak spots alike, and an even better coach will help individuals get what they want over just an output checklist.
 

2. Addressing the "Agile Plateau"
Many organizations experience an "agile plateau" after the initial success of implementing agile practices. They establish regular sprints/quarterly reviews,  use product backlogs, and hold retrospectives but find that productivity gains start to diminish or that deeper organizational issues remain unresolved. If the culture really hasn’t changed, and has no baseline to show that change, very often the Agile PMO/ACOE becomes hierarchical in nature. “You’re not agile if you’re not doing my kind of agile.” “An enterprise coach is a bigger, better title than a team coach.” If you are selling food, a sandwich or a chicken leg as a choice—one is better than the other to you, for specific wants and needs only you have identified.
 
Hiring an external enterprise coach for the sole purpose of a “refresh” allows for fresh perspectives and insights that help organizations break through a status quo plateau. By observing processes, group meetings, and team dynamics from an external viewpoint, a coach can identify overlooked nuanced and overt issues, inefficiencies, or opportunities for refinement that might not be apparent internally.
 

 3. Scaling Effectively
Scaling agile practices beyond small teams and projects introduces complexity, especially when applied across different departments or in large organizations. Frameworks like SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework) or LeSS (Large-Scale Scrum) provide solutions for scaling, but they often require careful implementation and constant iteration.
 
Coaches play a crucial role in guiding organizations through the challenges of scaling agile, ensuring that key behaviors for cross-functional collaboration, alignment with business goals, and customer-centric focus are happening. A coach also helps tailor scaling frameworks to suit an organization’s unique needs rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all approach. Product Managers, managing directors, developers whomever works within the system, has expertise. They are heads down(hopefully) on meeting the demand or surfacing the need. When we learn an agilist-as-change-agent “removes impediments,” it means not only when something is brought to their attention. They are the reconnaissance needed to scan the horizon on adaptive trends and better ways of working, facilitating stakeholder engagement and feedback loops alike.


4. Enhanced Team Interaction and Culture
Successful organizations rely heavily on team dynamics, trust, and open communication. However, conflicts, misalignment, or lack of psychological safety can undermine interpersonal communication, and product effectiveness.
 
A coach works to strengthen team dynamics by facilitating better communication, addressing and surfacing conflict and challenges, while providing the space for an environment of trust. Coaches often serve as neutral third parties who can mediate conflicts, provide feedback, and encourage self-awareness within teams. In this way, they nurture a healthy culture that aligns with core components of collaboration, respect, and transparency.
 

 5. Objective Feedback and Accountability
Internal teams often become entrenched in the day-to-day demands of their work, making it difficult to step back and objectively evaluate their own performance. A coach provides impartial, objective feedback that helps organizations stay aligned with their goals and what intrinsically matters to its people A good coach is not afraid to take a stance.
 
They hold teams and leaders accountable to what is actionable, ensuring responsiveness to change, customer collaboration, and continuous delivery—are upheld in practice, not just in theory. They act as a mirror, reflecting areas where an organization’s business units and/or teams may be veering off track and guide them to course-correct in real-time.
 

6. Leadership Evolvement
Change management requires a fundamental shift in leadership. Successful leaders have successful support from talented impassioned employees, and to get that support, they need to focus on enabling their teams, fostering autonomy, and removing obstacles rather than dictating solutions. For many organizations, this shift can be difficult for leaders who are accustomed to traditional management approaches. And they don’t want this called out in front of the very people they need to trust them, because making changes doesn’t mean throwing out the experience that got you there in the first place.
 
Having an external coach supports leadership in making adaptive transitions by offering guidance on promoting a culture of empowerment, and helping leaders understand their evolving roles allowing for quick pivoting within their organization. Coaches provide the tools and techniques needed to lead in a constantly changing environment. They can help develop the leadership pipeline within an organization and help leaders surface who their creative problem-solvers are.
 

7. Adaptability in a Changing Environment

Being able to respond to change, both in the market and within an organization gives a competitive edge in any industry. While frameworks are the window to seeing the adaptations, a model to make sense, organizations often struggle to navigate large-scale transformations, disruptions, or evolving customer needs in the midst of the necessary changes.
 
A coach helps organizations with the flow of value in the face of these changes, guiding them through periods of uncertainty. Coaches are adept at helping organizations recalibrate their strategies and operations while staying true to core principles, enabling them to pivot quickly and efficiently.
 

 Case Studies
 
 Case Study 1:
Breaking Through the Agile Plateau
A mid-sized software company had been practicing agile for two years but began noticing diminishing returns in their sprint outcomes. Despite regular retrospectives, the team could not identify the root cause of the decline. After bringing in an agile coach, the organization was able to surface hidden inefficiencies, including miscommunication between development and product teams. The coach facilitated better collaboration through workshops, improving both team cohesion and product delivery.
 
Case Study 2: Scaling Across Departments
A large enterprise in the financial services industry faced difficulties scaling agile practices beyond its technology teams. Leadership recognized the need for alignment across departments but lacked the expertise to implement frameworks like SAFe. With the help of a coach, the company successfully scaled agile practices across operations, marketing, and HR, integrating agile principles into their overall business strategy. This led to faster decision-making and improved responsiveness to customer needs.
 

Conclusion: Coaching as a Catalyst for Sustainment

In conclusion, adopting agile frameworks is only the beginning of a long-term journey toward creating a truly adaptive, customer-focused, and resilient organization. Coaches provide critical support by offering external insights, ensuring continuous improvement, developing leadership, and fostering team dynamics. Even in agile organizations, a coach can be the difference between simply practicing agile and truly thriving in an agile environment.
 
With the rapid pace of emergent technology and an overload of informational resources, the role of an external neutral coach is not a luxury, but a necessity for organizations that aim to stay ahead of the curve and consistently deliver value to their customers. An enterprise coach is multi-faceted in addressing resistant behaviors to aid in change management and transformations of many kinds. The investment in coaching yields returns in the form of higher performance, greater team satisfaction, and enhanced adaptability, making it a powerful enabler of sustained organizational success.
 
---

Contact Information:

To learn more about how follow-up coaching can benefit your agile organization, please reach out to
Cascadia Connections at info@cascadiaconnections.com


Resources

By Lynn Wolf-Hill July 24, 2025
 A couple of years ago a friend shared an article on how a man made art using artificial intelligence and had an online store. I think his real money came from charging people to learn how to do it. She said,” You could do that!” I wasn’t really sold on the idea but did check out the app she sent my way. It was fun to play with it. I could tweak the prompts and refine how it showed up, long before I knew what a “prompt” was. It had a free trial, and then a monthly price, but as it was in beta, if I gave it a lump sum I could have it for life. And so I did… I used to create images with it every day, but I can’t remember the last time I used it. I can now do the same thing in ChatGPT if I really work hard on the prompts, super specific. I initially paid for the pro version, and now I am using the “plus” option. This allows you to use it as much as you like, and you have access to early releases of functionality. I can think of similar evolution of online tools. There was a race between My Space and Facebook. Before some of the widely used browsers like Google and Safari, there were SO MANY browsers. I like Infoseek and Peoplefinder. Their titles alluded to their differentiation from the competition. And now…? Workplaces got all policy-happy with use of internet at work, and now it’s free out-of-the-box software included with your laptop. So why pay for AI? I very often see these AI-generated advertisements letting me know that old people only use AI like they would Google, and then the ad will go on to list all the AI tools and apps you need to train yourself daily. “Wait, am I being bullied into doing homework? Initially, just as companies have self-contained large learning models, I believed if I paid for my AI, my “projects “or “agents,” were protected. I was writing The A3 Framework: Staying Ahead of the Curve by Combining Agile, AI, and Audit. Related to that activity, I was researching a great deal around international protections in place. (They changed more than once in a short timeframe. I was concerned that things I wrote and submitted could be searched for and found by anybody, making my book obsolete before it was ever published. I really really wish I had searched on the public version for contrast. I did compare different AI tools to contrast what came back. Some were better than others. And now, many organizations are asking employees to use internal AI tools to “teach” the LLM. Several people I have been coaching have provided some feedback on this. Their insight includes frustration with teaching the internal tool when they already had trained their own LLM, and the AI gave them worthless return on their prompts. There’s concern that their ideas can be “stolen,” or what they looked for can be somehow weaponized by HR. So what is your favorite AI platform? I miss my “Ask Jeeves” browser… are we going to continue paying for AI, and are we sure the very things we think need protecting ARE? A couple of years ago, a friend sent me an article about a guy who used artificial intelligence to make art and sell it online. She said, “You could do that!” I wasn’t totally sold on the idea, but I tried out the app she recommended. It was fun—tweaking the inputs and refining what showed up, even before I knew what a “prompt” was. The app had a free trial and a monthly fee, but since it was still in beta, I could pay a lump sum for lifetime access. So I did. I used to generate images every day. Now? I can’t remember the last time I opened it. These things evolve fast. I can now create similar images in ChatGPT—if I get really specific with the prompts. I’ve gone from using the “pro” version to “plus,” which gives me unlimited access and early releases of new tools. It feels like I’m always upgrading, always shifting, but never really arriving. I’ve seen this before. Remember My Space vs. Facebook? Or before Google and Safari took over—there were tons of browsers: I liked Infoseek and PeopleFinder. Their names hinted at their unique flavor. And now? Browsers are just baked into your laptop, part of the default software package. No big deal. So, why pay for AI? Lately I keep seeing ads that say only “old people” use AI like Google. Then the ad flips and starts listing the 12 AI tools I’m apparently supposed to train myself on daily. Wait—am I being bullied into doing homework? When I first started using AI tools to help write The A3 Framework: Staying Ahead of the Curve by Combining Agile, AI, and Audit, I assumed that paying for them meant my data was protected. I believed that my “projects” or “agents” were somehow mine. I was researching a lot of international privacy protocols at the time (which changed more than once during the writing process), and I was genuinely worried that drafts I submitted could be scraped and show up in someone else’s search results before my book was even published. I really wish I had searched on the public version too—just for contrast. I did compare responses across different AI tools. Some were better than others. But I didn’t expect the rapid pace of change to outpace the very protections I was researching. And now, many companies are encouraging employees to “teach” internal AI tools—to help train their organization’s LLMs. Several of the people I’ve coached have shared frustrations with this. Some of them had already spent time training their own personal LLMs to get decent results. Now they’re being asked to start over—often for worse outcomes. There’s also this quiet anxiety around ideas being harvested, someone tracing their searches, will this be used by HR in ways I didn’t agree to? The discomfort is real. We pay for AI tools hoping for privacy, productivity, maybe even a competitive edge—but are we getting that? Or are we just onboarding ourselves into systems we don’t fully understand? So what IS your favorite AI platform? I miss my Ask Jeeves browser. Maybe we’re not just paying for AI—we’re paying for a false sense of control.
October 18, 2024
Why Your VSPMs Aren't Delivering - And How Generative AI Can Fix It!
More Posts